Danis Baybekov vs Damir Makhmudov Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L W L L L
Form
L L L L L L L L L LHead To Head: Baybekov 1 - 0 Makhmudov
They have played 3 sets in total, with Baybekov winning 2 and Makhmudov winning 1. The last match between Baybekov and Makhmudov was at the Kazakhstan F8 (Shymkent), 22-09-2018, Q1 round, Clay with Danis Baybekov getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Danis Baybekov | 1 |
| Damir Makhmudov | 0 |
Kazakhstan F8 (Shymkent)(22-09-2018)
6
3
3
6
6
1
| Baybekov | Stats | Makhmudov |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 27 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 31% (9-20) | Career Total W/L | 11% (6-49) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Danis Baybekov
Player
Damir Makhmudov
51%
(
47 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
7
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 10 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:21:0 | Average Match Time | 2:21:0 |
| 51% (47/92) | 1st Serve % | 62% (51/82) |
| 64% (30/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (30/51) |
| 51% (23/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (13/31) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 48% (39/82) | Return Points Win % | 42% (39/92) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Danis Baybekov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Scott Duncan
Player
Danis Baybekov
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
4
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dostanbek Tashbulatov
Player
Danis Baybekov
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 5-7 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sharobiddin Abzalov
Player
Danis Baybekov
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Danis Baybekov
Player
Damir Makhmudov
51%
(
47 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
7
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alibek Aidaraly
Player
Danis Baybekov
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
12
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Danis Baybekov
Player
Islom Anvarkhodjaev
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Konstantin Kravchuk
Player
Danis Baybekov
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexey Zakharov
Player
Danis Baybekov
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Liutarevich
Player
Danis Baybekov
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Damir Makhmudov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 2-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31% (9/20) | Win/Loss | 11% (6/49) |
| 32% (21/44) | Sets Win/Loss | 18% (22/101) |
| 42% (248/349) | Games Win/Loss | 34% (373/712) |
| 21% (3/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 5% (1/20) |
| 43% (6/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 17% (5/25) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 11 | Aces Total | 23 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 36 | Total Double Faults | 143 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 261.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 186.71 |
| 59% (406/690) | 1st Serve % | 58% (784/1341) |
| 58% (235/406) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (426/784) |
| 44% (124/284) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (227/557) |
| 30% (18/61) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (47/114) |
| 36% (232/638) | Return Points Win % | 39% (505/1291) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 31% (9/20) | Futures W/L | 11% (6/49) |
| 31% (9/29) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 11% (6/55) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (5/9) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 57% (4/7) | Deciding Set Win % | 23% (3/13) |
| 86% (7/6) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 56% (9/5) |
| 14% (7/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 44% (9/4) |
| 14% (22/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 2% (46/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
